The cave of Roucadour is a large cavity with easy access, formed by a steep descending main gallery m wide; 15 m high and a lateral gallery 40 m long.
The figures are at the end of the lateral gallery, 6 m above the present floor level. The paintings and engravings in the Roucadour cave, France, are attributed to the oldest phase of Paleolithic Art in Quercy, between 28, and 24, years BP. The paintings are limited to negative hands a dozen human hands painted in black carbon black or in red red ochre and to some painted engravings.
The first paintings were cave paintings. Ancient peoples decorated walls of protected caves with paint made from dirt or charcoal mixed with spit or animal fat.
In cave paintings, the pigments stuck to the wall partially because the pigment became trapped in the porous wall, and partially because the binding media the spit or fat dried and adhered the pigment to the wall. This cobble is a reddish jasper silicate mineral containing iron oxide stone which appears to have the shape of a head. Firstly we know that jasper could not have occurred naturally in the dolomite cave where it was found, so it must have been carried there.
Secondly, the markings do not appear to be natural they bear all the impressions of having been carved. Jasper pebble of reddish colour found in at Makapansgat, South Africa. Thirdly, because of the place it was found in and the materials around it, it has been suggested that it was deposited in the cave by Australopithecus africanus.
They were dominant in the Lower Palaeolithic Period almost 3 million years ago. Evidence shows they decorated themselves with beads, collected exotic stones and there is evidence of the collection and use of ochre as a decoration. More substantial evidence of this spiritual character, that could have led to cave art, is burials from the Lower Palaeolithic period about , years ago.
These burials contain grave goods and the people used colour on their bodies in the form of tattoos. These tattoos are drawn using such minerals as ochre, manganese oxide or charcoal. Later they painted on cave walls using lines, circles and V markings. It is later in the Upper Palaeolithic period that there is the appearance of carved anthropomorphic animal and human images with strange symbols and marks and the creation of cave paintings.
All this evidence would suggest Palaeolithic humans had begun to believe in supernatural or spiritual beings early on. It can be argued that we have always collected things and doodled, so how is that connected to the cave paintings? Archaeologists argue that collecting is connected to ritual a series of actions performed according to a prescribed order and that is an indicator of a belief system or religious behaviour. So ritual and religion is an essential mark of modern human behaviour.
It has been said that it displays the emergence of the modern mind. From the evidence available it is assumed that this aspect of human behaviour emerged around 40 - 50, years ago. Hundreds of images of animals in vibrant colour and striking poses of action can be seen in the prehistoric art gallery on rocks worldwide.
There are many examples in France and Spain. These cave wall paintings are known as pictographs and are found all over the world alongside petroglyphs the incised, pecked or cut designs on rock surfaces. The word art does not appear before the 15 th century so the Palaeolithic people did not know it as art. Using the word art from the 15 th century means that the Egyptians, Greeks and Romans had no word for art. In fact art is a Middle English word coming from the Latin ars skill or technique.
The first use of the word art was when it was used to show a mark of human achievement in the early universities and that exists today in the Bachelor of Arts BA or Master of Art MA awarded by universities.
Yet, art is more than a skill or technique. It has a purpose going beyond making something. Any connection with our modern use of the word art did not appear until the late s. So it is possible some of the pictures were used to teach young hunters but so many of them have other characteristics that mean there had to have been links with some belief system.
Each set of paintings show differences and a development in style of representation. In Chauvet the drawings depict animals. It is suggested that these represent the animals that provided the people with food and raw materials along with the predators that endangered or competed with them.
The Lascaux paintings, on the other hand, show depictions of strange beasts such as ones that are half-human and half-bird and others that are half-human and half-lion. Those in Niaux are depicted as a huge frieze showing bison, deer, ibex, and horse and there are carvings showing salmon or trout and bears claws.
Consequently, some archaeologists have seen these representations as indications of the development of a form of religion. Read our privacy policy. A visit to Lascaux, France would reward you with this Figure 1 , one of the walls of the cave. It dates back to the Palaeolithic period 17, years ago. The problem is that, in the study of cave art, archaeologists have spent a lot of time trying to interpret the art, but many seem to disregard the paints because the assumption was that they are easy to analyse and understand.
Recent archaeological work has uncovered some of the tools these people used. One notable find is a shell in this case an abalone shell used to hold the pigment and a quartzite stone for grinding up the pigments like charcoal and ochre Figure 2 , and for the paint brush the artist used one of the thin bones from the front leg of a wolf with one end dipped in ochre. Analysing and studying the various compounds such those above allows us to understand something of the technology employed in cave painting.
Comparing the minerals used in an area with those found there allows archaeologists to determine the trade routes of these early painters.
The aims of analysing paint from any painting are to gain some idea of its composition, its preparation and its geographic origin. Obviously the paints these early peoples used must have been very durable and the results of this art have been found in many parts of the world other than Eurasia. Palaeolithic artists seem to have used two main colours although others have been found in some cave art. The dominant two are red which tends to be iron oxide: natural hematite or heated goethite and black charcoal or manganese oxides.
Excavations of Palaeolithic rock sites in Europe and other parts of the world have found evidence of many pigments. Probably the most spectacular are the shards of ochre formed into shapes such as the following example, Figure 3, from South Africa.
Ochre is normally found in Lower Palaeolithic sites as a red powder associated with burials. It would be reasonable to consider this red colour is representative of blood and seen as the life spirit of the person.
Black ochre has been found in some of these sites but the most common is red. Ochre has been found on other artefacts as a stain or residue such as on cobble hammers, grindstones and nodules. Arguably these situations, in which ochre is involved, could be interpreted as stages in the process of producing ochre powder or connected to ritual activities.
From analyses of cave painting materials it appears that these pigments have been prepared in different ways. The cave artists must have spent a lot of time wandering around looking for the different colours they needed. A lot of research has been done in this area and one thing that has been noted is the palette range of this period.
In the Lascaux cave in France there are red and yellow hydrated and anhydrous haematite iron III oxide ochres, manganese oxide browns, blacks, and calcite white. In Altamira, Spain, red haematite iron III oxide is dominant while in Provence, Southern France, alongside the haematite and red earth there is the use of bauxite red aluminium oxide and maghemite a red form of iron II oxide. This implies the colour and properties of the pigments were important and not the mineral type.
They developed the technique of heating substances to produce a new substance; a chemical reaction in which yellow ochre produces a new red substance different from the natural haematite ochre or red earth terra rossa. This does not mean they were chemists but they were aware of chemical change and used it as a craft tool.
The pigments were ground finely. We are not sure how this was done but some millstones have been found with pigment deposits. These grounds were placed into water and the heavier quartz granules sank to the bottom leaving the clay and coloured oxides in suspension. The liquid evaporated either through being left or heated leaving a residue; the ochre pigment. In trade terms, the finer the pigment grain the more expensive it would be.
They are illustrated they understood the need for controlling particle size and how a fluid can be used to separate things by density. Many of these mineral pigments would be quarried or mined from the rocks near the settlements Figure 4.
It is important to consider the colours that were used because it helps us understand the way that artists use their pigments. Berlin and Kay in argued, based upon analysis of painting from around the world, that first there is a distinction between light and dark, ie white and black. Next, the use of red as a distinctive primary colour, then as secondary colours comes the use of green, yellow, then blue and finally as tertiary colours brown, purple, orange, pink and grey.
From this study of modern native artists and their use of colour there does appear to be a theory of colour use. Art is not just about the reproduction of an image. Over time it is noted that some artists are fascinated by the effects of light and use this to produce changes in their image. Some use colour symbolically to represent ideas and some use colour to express emotions. So colour theory gives us a vocabulary to begin to understand an art form or design.
It is also useful in detecting fakes in painting.
0コメント