But writing, to Doyle, was very much an imaginative or moral exercise, and not just a parlor game where the intellectual elite would try to identify the models for his best-known characters. Sherlock Holmes, it seems fair to say, was a composite of several historical, living or invented figures. But, critically, Holmes also reflected the personality of his creator, a man who combined a lifelong passion for scientific inquiry with a finely honed sense of honor and justice and, just as important, an absolute willingness to offend the political or religious orthodoxy of the day.
This, then, is a tale of two detectives. Today there are thriving clubs and societies and, thanks to the internet, enjoyably spirited long-distance discussions that try and establish such matters as which train, exactly, Holmes might have taken to Baskerville Hall, or the correct location of the wound Watson suffered in the Afghan War.
Wodehouse, who continue to excite such fanatical and, at times, slightly dotty devotion. Sherlock Holmes is an austere masterpiece; a universally recognizable character made up of several true-life or imagined ingredients.
Conan Doyle was eminently well qualified to write about the horrors of Victorian urban life, having worked as a young medical assistant in s Sheffield and Birmingham, among other character-forming experiences. In short, the man who invented Sherlock Holmes was on terms of more than passing familiarity with the forces of social and criminal darkness.
Even to scholars and those countless ordinary fans around the world who devote themselves to a close textual study of the series—the so-called Holmesians or Sherlockians—there are still tantalizing gaps and unresolved discrepancies. Might Holmes have been schizophrenic? Was he a practical joker? Or totally humorless? Did he vote? If he was able to turn on a certain amount of charm, as indicated by these episodes, there is no indication of a serious or long-term interest apart from the case of Adler.
Watson states that Holmes has an "aversion to women" but "a peculiarly ingratiating way with [them]. How can you build on such quicksand? Their most trivial actions may mean volumes On the other hand, it may be noted that the landlady, Mrs Hudson, is never actually described.
Another point of interest in Holmes' relationships with women, is that the only joy he gets from their company is the problems they bring to him to solve. Watson writes in " The Adventure of the Dying Detective " that Mrs Hudson is fond of Holmes in her own way, despite his bothersome eccentricities as a lodger, owing to his "remarkable gentleness and courtesy in his dealings with women. Holmes cannot be said to be misogynistic, given the number of women he helps in his work, but it may be that his own detached and analytical personality is annoyed by their excessively emotional from his perspective natures.
Watson, on the other hand, has a perhaps justifiable reputation as a ladies' man, boasting in The Sign of Four of "an experience of women which extends over many nations and three separate continents. It is of some interest to logicians and those interested in logic to try to analyze just what Holmes is doing when he performs his deduction. Holmesian British adjective; Americans may be rarely heard to say "Sherlockian" deduction appears to consist primarily of drawing inferences based on either straightforward practical principles — which are the result of careful inductive study, such as Holmes' study of different kinds of cigar ashes or inference to the best explanation.
In many cases, the deduction can be modeled either way. In , Holmes was inducted as an honorary fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry the only fictional character so honored in appreciation of the contributions to forensic investigation.
Holmes' straightforward practical principles are generally of the form, "If 'p', then 'q'," where 'p' is observed evidence and 'q' is what the evidence indicates. But there are also, as one may observe in the following example, often some intermediate principles. In " A Scandal in Bohemia " Holmes deduces that Watson had got very wet lately and that he had "a most clumsy and careless servant girl. My eyes tell me that on the inside of your left shoe, just where the firelight strikes it, the leather is scored by six almost parallel cuts.
Obviously they have been caused by someone who has very carelessly scraped round the edges of the sole in order to remove crusted mud from it. Hence, you see, my double deduction that you had been out in vile weather, and that you had a particularly malignant boot-slitting specimen of the London slavery.
By applying such principles in an obvious way using repeated applications of modus ponens , Holmes is able to infer from. But perhaps Holmes is not giving a proper explanation — after all, Holmes may be well aware of Watson's servant girl. As Watson is a doctor and it has been raining, it is likely he has been out in the rain. In other instances of Holmesian deduction, it is more difficult to model his inference as deduction using general principles, and logicians and scientists will readily recognise the method used, instead, as an "inductive" one — in particular, "argument to the best explanation", or, in Charles S.
Peirce's terminology, "abduction". However, that Holmes should have called this "deduction" is entirely plausible. The instances in which Holmes uses deduction tend to be those where he has amassed a large body of evidence, produced a number of possible explanations of that evidence, and then proceeds to find one explanation that is clearly the best at explaining the evidence.
For example, in The Sign of Four , a man is found dead in his room, with a ghastly smile on his face, and with no immediately visible cause of death. From a whole body of background information as well as evidence gathered at and around the scene of the crime, Holmes is able to infer that the murderer is not one of the various people that Scotland Yard has in custody each of them being an alternative explanation , but rather another person entirely.
As Holmes says in the story, "How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? It also turned up in the Dirk Gently stories by Douglas Adams where the detective uses the opposite phrase, "because we know very much about what is improbable, but very little about what is possible". In the latter example, in fact, Holmes' solution of the crime depends both on a series of applications of general principles and argument to the best explanation.
Holmes' success at his brand of deduction, therefore, is due to his mastery of both a huge body of particular knowledge of things like footprints, cigar ashes, and poisons, which he uses to make relatively simple deductive inferences, and the fine art of ordering and weighing different competing explanations of a body of evidence.
Holmes is also particularly good at gathering evidence by observation, as well locating and tracking the movements of criminals through the streets of London and its environs in order to produce more evidence - skills that have little to do with deduction per se , but everything to do with providing the premises for particular Holmesian deductions.
In the stories by Conan Doyle, Holmes often remarked that his logical conclusions were "elementary", in that he considered them to be simple and obvious. He also, on occasion, referred to his friend as "my dear Watson".
However, the complete phrase, "Elementary, my dear Watson", does not appear in any of the sixty Holmes stories written by Conan Doyle. It does appear at the very end of the film, The Return of Sherlock Holmes , the first Sherlock Holmes sound film, and may owe its familiarity to its use in Edith Meiser's scripts for The New Adventures of Sherlock Holmes radio series. It should be noted too, that our modern stereotype of police procedure — someone who looks for physical clues, rather than someone who examines opportunity and motive — comes from Holmes.
Readers of the Sherlock Holmes stories have often been surprised to discover that their author, Conan Doyle, was a fervent believer in paranormal phenomena, and that the logical, skeptical character of Holmes was in opposition to his own in many ways.
The word "Sherlock" has entered the language to mean a detective or used sarcastically if someone states the obvious. It must be noted that, in Holmesian deduction, it is important to attempt to eliminate all other possibilities, or as many as possible. This requires quite a bit of practice to reach. Watson attempts several times to perform Holmesian deductions, and even gives his explanations.
However, he fails to recognise other equally probable circumstances, and is wrong on almost every count. Holmes fans refer to the period from to the time between Holmes' disappearance and presumed death in " The Adventure of the Final Problem " and his reappearance in " The Adventure of the Empty House " as "the Great Hiatus". It is notable, though, that one later story " The Adventure of Wisteria Lodge " is described as taking place in Conan Doyle wrote the stories over the course of a decade.
Wanting to devote more time to his historical novels, he killed off Holmes in "The Final Problem", which appeared in print in After resisting public pressure for eight years, the author wrote The Hound of the Baskervilles , which appeared in , implicitly setting it before Holmes' "death" some theorise that it actually took place after "The Return" but with Watson planting clues to an earlier date.
Many have speculated on his motives for bringing Holmes back to life, notably writer-director Nicholas Meyer, who wrote an essay on the subject in the s, but the actual reasons are not known, other than the obvious: publishers offered to pay generously.
For whatever reason, Conan Doyle continued to write Holmes stories for a quarter-century longer. Some writers have come up with alternate explanations for the hiatus.
In Meyer's novel, The Seven-Per-Cent Solution , the hiatus was explained as a secret sabbatical that Holmes indulged in for those years after his drug rehabilitation treatment with Sigmund Freud's help, while he light-heartedly suggested that Watson write a fictitious account claiming he had died: "They'll never believe you in any case. John Kendrick Bangs, creator of Bangsian fantasy, wrote a book in called Pursuit of the House-Boat a sequel to his A House-Boat on the Styx , in which the souls of famous dead people start up a club in Hades.
In it, the house-boat which was hijacked at the end of A House-Boat on the Styx by Captain Kidd is tracked down by the members of the club with the aid of none other than Sherlock Holmes who is indeed dead. In his memoirs, Conan Doyle quotes a reader, who judged the later stories inferior to the earlier ones, to the effect that when Holmes went over the Reichenbach Falls, he may not have been killed, but he was never quite the same man after.
The differences in the pre- and post-Hiatus Holmes have in fact created speculation among those who play "The Game" making believe Sherlock Holmes was a historical person. Among the more interesting and plausible theories: the later Holmes was in fact an impostor perhaps even Professor Moriarty , the later stories were fictions created to fill other writers' pockets this is often used to deal with the stories which supposedly are written by Holmes himself , and Holmes and Professor Moriarty were in fact a variation of Robert Louis Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
Among the more fanciful theories, the story The Case of the Detective's Smile by Mark Bourne, published in the anthology Sherlock Holmes in Orbit , posits that one of the places Holmes visited during his hiatus was Alice's Wonderland. While there, he solved the case of the stolen tarts, and his experiences there contributed to his kicking the cocaine addiction. Baker Street Wiki Explore.
Fan Fiction, art and other fanworks. The first Sherlock Holmes film was produced in Perhaps one of the quirkiest twenty first-century homages to Holmes belongs to the award-winning American TV series House, which began transmitting in , starring the British actor, Hugh Laurie. Now into his fifth season, Dr Gregory House is in many respects a medical Sherlock Holmes, and series creator, David Shore, has admitted that even Dr House name is meant as a subtle homage.
0コメント